It is important for us to keep in mind that Catholic morality is not determined by voting majorities. The commission was not a legislative body; it was an advisory one. If the method for determining Catholic morality should be democratic rule, then we should go a step further than the Papal Commission: We should put such decisions before all baptized Catholics (practicing or not) to be decided.H/T to Rich Leonardi.
Some people advocate a version of this in their misinterpretation of the sensus fidei or “appreciation of the faith” as mentioned in the chapter on the laity in Vatican II’s Lumen Gentium (35). However, we do not want a church that puts morality up to popular vote or opinion polls. The crowds cheered Jesus at His entry into Jerusalem, and they condemned Him later that week, calling for His crucifixion. The crowd is fickle; the Holy Spirit is not.
Showing posts with label moral law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label moral law. Show all posts
Friday, March 12, 2010
Faith by democracy?
From a letter to the Cincinnati Catholic Telegraph:
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
The Moral Law vs. God
Fr. Mitch Pacwa, S.J., answered a tough question on Threshold of Hope this week. Paraphrased, the question was: "Is the moral law which differentiates good from evil something that God dictates (and therefore what is good is good because He says so), or is God good because He conforms to this moral law (which therefore exists outside and before Him)?" In other words, is the moral law arbitrary because God invented it or is God subject to it because it was not created by Him?
I'll post his answer here later, but until then, does anyone want to try and give an answer? (Hint: think tertium quid.)
I'll post his answer here later, but until then, does anyone want to try and give an answer? (Hint: think tertium quid.)
Labels:
ewtn,
fr. mitch pacwa,
moral law,
television,
theology,
threshold of hope
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)